Reuters Journalists has not reached the data suggests that the European Commission will ban Google these requirements or encourage Android manufacturers to provide services of this company. And it reminds me of a similar struggle, as a stupid way).
there Is an ideological dispute between politologami, philosophers and Economics on the theme the concept of the state and the extent of his responsibility. The hand suggests that the state should not intervene in the lives of citizens and companies, performing the role of guardian of law and order. Left, in turn, believes that the state is to protect citizens and to intervene in the case of a crisis. At least such as abuse of dominance in the market by expanding trader. The economic ideology of the left currently dominates in the EU, and us, Spider’s Web, must worry.
this Policy has for directly affects what is written here.
today we write about Google, which for a long time is a party to the dispute with the European Commission. It rightly points out that in consumer markets the Internet and mobile communications that Google is the dominant force, with these markets such influence that they could shape for themselves, very difficult competition in these third parties. The diagnosis is accurate, but controversial potential solution: the penalty and the warrant for the execution of an action.
the Fine should be very high. And the action-termination nakazywania equipment manufacturers with Android connect to Google apps and configuring Google Search engine by default. It should be noted that the separation of Android from Google’s services is not required. The manufacturer of the equipment himself to solve it.
I Remember such decisions, which bring more confusion than good
Google is not the first it giant to suffer the penalty of monopolistyczne practices in the European Union. We all remember Windows N, which did not buy one, and which was created as a version without Windows Media Player. Of course, we all remember also the warrant issued by the European Commission, which resulted in a browser choice screen in Windows. For those who do not remember the Windows when you first start displays the query about the choice of default browser, offering product descriptions of your competitors and links to their installers.
this Example illustrates how pointless such regulations. From start time trial over time her actions before and after the announcement of its result, the Commission has changed in the market of web browsers very much. A revolution that has quietly begun Opera and which is gaining strength thanks to Mozilla has launched the process of demolition Internet Explorer and on the sidelines. The browser choice screen has not changed anything that affected the market will be negligible. The best product, as it was in Firefox (and which, for some reason, was not an Opera, despite the fact that offered that Firefox much earlier) won. Paved also way another alternative browser on the market, such as Google Chrome.
Spider’s Web, as seen through the eyes Tridenta, renderer in Internet Explorer
so What will change, the European Commission, if the article with Reuters.com we believe the most likely, and so likely? Let’s see first who the manufacturers dare to offer Android without Google services. Then, if such, however, we will find that ask yourself what he has a chance in the market. Many companies have already tried. Cm. Amazon and its phones and tablets the line of Fire. Cm. Nokia to offer phones with Android and Microsoft services. Excluding the few technically informed consumers, existing Android users expect from Google. If they will not get, then you will find them. Because they are used to them, because they have there own data. And I remind you that Android is the dominant force in the market, in the end, because that’s why is the whole procedure. This means that a sufficiently large part of the area of the phone without Google services, but rather, not buy.
in addition, let’s not forget that Google is obliged collaborative AOSP (which makes). It is, in General, no proprietary Android applications and Google services. The popularity of the approach in the market is negligible.
what if I’m not mistaken?
Because Microsoft is just waiting to mass to offer Office, Skype and Cortana to a large group of new users and he is not alone. There is only one company that actually could use the situation to change the balance of power in the market. It is a Microsoft partner, the only manufacturer of the equipment, earning the really big money selling Android phones, and which is so loved and appreciated that its phones can continue to sell well, despite the divorce with Google. Samsung, which has already planned how to get away from dependence on the giant from mountain view.
Wątpiłbym however, this possible breakthrough. Samsung has too much to lose relative to what would have purchased. Game niewarta candles, and, in addition, Google will have provided that information from Reuters real warrant for weakening its policy on the territory of the European Union. Microsoft decided not to offer the browser choice screen outside the EU. Google, most likely, also will not refuse orders connection Android with Google apps in other markets.
So instead of having to make unnecessary confusion can przyswójmy lesson in itself, extending from the browser choice screen in Windows. Zrezygnujmy of unequal relationships, zrezygnujmy with unnecessary and expensive bureaucracy and give something better from Android, in the end, to knock, instead of force to support inferior products. Internet Explorer was overthrown all over the world and not just EU, Firefox and Chrome. And Android itself is also responsible for the lower values of Windows in the world. There is someone who answers the Android and Google services, and their current market dominance. Relax, it’s only a matter of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment